Dialogue Management in the Agreement Negotiation Process: A Model that Involves Natural Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the paper we describe an approach to dialogue management in the agreement negotiation where one of the central roles is attributed to the model of natural human reasoning. The reasoning model consists of the model of human motivational sphere, and of reasoning algorithms. The reasoning model is interacting with the model of communication process. The latter is considered as rational activity where central role play the concepts of communicative strategies and tactics.
منابع مشابه
Argumentation in the Agreement Negotiation Process: A Model that Involves Natural Reasoning
1 University of Tartu, Estonia email: [email protected] Abstract. This paper describes a computational model that we are implementing in an experimental dialogue system. Agreement negotiation process is modelled where one participant is trying to influence his/her partner to agree to do an action. Argumentation is used to direct reasoning of the partner. Our goal is to model natural dialogue wher...
متن کاملImproving Agent Performance for Multi-Resource Negotiation Using Learning Automata and Case-Based Reasoning
In electronic commerce markets, agents often should acquire multiple resources to fulfil a high-level task. In order to attain such resources they need to compete with each other. In multi-agent environments, in which competition is involved, negotiation would be an interaction between agents in order to reach an agreement on resource allocation and to be coordinated with each other. In recent ...
متن کاملTradeoff Negotiation: The Importance of Getting in the Game; Comment on “Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage”
Swiss-CHAT’s playful approach to public rationing can be considered in terms of deliberative process design as well as in terms of health policy. The process’ forced negotiation of trade-offs exposed unexamined driving questions, and challenged prevalent presumptions about health care demand and about conditions of public reasoning that enable transparent rationing. While the experiment provide...
متن کاملDeal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning for Negotiation Dialogues
Much of human dialogue occurs in semicooperative settings, where agents with different goals attempt to agree on common decisions. Negotiations require complex communication and reasoning skills, but success is easy to measure, making this an interesting task for AI. We gather a large dataset of human-human negotiations on a multi-issue bargaining task, where agents who cannot observe each othe...
متن کاملPreference Extraction and Reasoning in Negotiation Dialogues Preference Extraction and Reasoning in Negotiation Dialogues
Modelling user preferences is crucial in many real-life problems, ranging from individual and collective decision-making to strategic interactions between agents for example. But handling preferences is not easy. Since agents don’t come with their preferences transparently given in advance, we have only two means to determine what they are if we wish to exploit them in reasoning: we can infer t...
متن کامل